Due to changing needs and technologies, the SMT Executive Board has decided to retire SMT Discuss (effective Nov. 9, 2021). Posts will be preserved for archival purposes, but new posts and replies are no longer permitted.
Affliation or Location
CCNY and NYU
Schenkerian Analysis, Rock Analysis, Chromaticism, Feminist Music Theory, Women Composers, Seventeenth-Century Music
I'm in agreement with most here: shorter papers and many of the other suggestions. Although I've been invited to participate as part of special sessions, I've never had a paper accepted blindly by an SMT program committee (I've probably subm…
NM wrote: " You rightly describe m. 24-25 as introducing the "E♭/E♮ thing". But there, the chromatic movement is E♭–E♮–F, while in m. 26-27 it is F–E♮–E♭..." Yes, that was my point! Sorry if I wasn't more clear.
As for the hearing/seeing thing, I'm…
I am not in any way fluent in German, I used a dictionary, my knowledge of some of Schenker's terms, and the music to guide me through the passage. Just to be clear!
But I think Schenker was making a point about chromaticism and tonicization/modulat…
I see. I wasn't discussing prolongation or anything, I was just saying that I can't hear that chord as a vi7, since I hear the passage in Bb minor, so I wouldn't label it that way. (Schenker didn't either; he analyzes those measures in B-flat…
Are you looking for examples if interrupted/unresolved augmented sixth chords? Because I don't hear the second chord in m. 27 as a vi7 chord. I hear it as an extension of the augmented sixth chord, just unresolved because the E-natural goes t…